airmap.my compiles public information about Malaysian AI policy into structured, citable form. The datasets below underpin the analysis across this site. They are drawn from public sources and free to cite with attribution.
Malaysian AI policy is documented across dozens of scattered sources — a 102-page roadmap Playbook, ministry press releases, agency launch statements, budget speeches and international indices — with no single structured record of what was promised, what shipped, and when. These datasets exist to close that gap. Each one turns a piece of that record into something you can scan, sort and cite: the roadmap’s measurable targets and their status, its eleven flagship use cases, the policy timeline from 2021 to 2026, the data-centre investment wave, Malaysia’s AI-readiness trajectory, and the 2021 baseline survey. Together they form the evidence base behind every sector and review page here.
This page is a living index — as we structure more of the underlying data, it will be listed here.
Compiled data on Malaysian AI
AI-Rmap targets scorecard
The 44 measurable targets of the 2021 roadmap, each with strategy, horizon and status. — View the scorecard →
The 11 National AI Use Cases
The roadmap’s flagship projects by priority area, with status. — View the tracker →
Malaysian AI policy timeline
Key institutions, documents and laws from 2021 to 2026. — View the timeline →
Data-centre investment
Approved projects, investment value and the hyperscaler commitments behind them. — View the tracker →
AI-readiness trajectory
Malaysia’s Oxford Insights Government AI Readiness scores over time. — View the data →
The 2021 AI-Rmap Survey
The national readiness survey of 173 organisations that informed the roadmap. — View the survey →
Using this data
You are welcome to cite or reference these datasets with attribution to airmap.my and a link to the relevant page. The underlying facts come from public sources documented on our sources page. Figures are point-in-time and we update them as the picture changes; where a number is contested or evolving, we say so on the page itself.
How to read a status rating
Across the scorecards and trackers, status reflects the best public evidence as of the stated revision date — not an official government assessment. A target marked delivered means there is a clear, verifiable public record of completion; reframed means the ambition was met in a different form than originally written; and unverified means we could not find public evidence either way, which is a finding in itself rather than a judgement of failure. Where a single source is the basis for a figure, or where a number comes from an organisation reporting on its own performance, we flag it so you can weigh it accordingly.
All datasets are compiled by airmap.my from public sources for research and reference. Full source documentation: airmap.my/sources. Independent of any government agency.